Adobe lightroom mac9/23/2023 ![]() ![]() We took the time to comparatively edit a variety of photos across all the apps in an effort to see which provided the best results up front, which provided the most editing leeway, and which got us from raw file to edited output most efficiently.ĭesign and ease of use: Though much of the core functionality is shared between apps in this category, the way tools are presented, how granular the controls are, and how customizable the interface is can all influence how you work. While initial rendering can be a useful data point, it doesn’t say enough about the quality of the processing engine. That first restriction narrowed our field of contenders significantly, and from there we considered the remaining apps according to the following characteristics:įeatures and processing quality: It’s all too common to see photo editors judged based on their initial rendering of a file rather than the potential results after processing. ![]() are fantastic at what they do, they are beyond the scope of this piece. We’re interested in tools that are designed to take you from initial import and culling all the way to final polish and export.Īs a result, while standalone editors like Adobe Photoshop, Affinity Photo, Pixelmator Pro, Skylum Luminar, etc. This all-in-one approach is appealing not only because it provides an integrated workflow, but because it allows you to manage your photo files with more organizational control than a simple file structure would. It’s important to note that this comparison is specific to photo editors that also provide Digital Asset Management (DAM) features. It’s jam-packed with training, ideas, and lessons that can literally transform your photography overnight. Transform your photos and edits from average to awesome with our in-depth, mobile photography course. If you don't hold onto your Macs for a long time, you may not need to "future proof" against increasing OS and software RAM requirements.Get Our Best Photography Tips & Workflows It might turn out that you won't need as much as I or other people do. You can also monitor your own current RAM use to obtain an idea about how much RAM you need. I've been doing that for years and it has saved me money that I can better use elsewhere. Adding external SSD space is easy and can be less expensive than paying Apple's considerable markup. If saving money is behind your query, I would suggest focusing on internal storage instead. Photographers who regularly push the envelope may be better served by the M1X Macs with more RAM but they may not need as much physical RAM as in the past. Things are different now but I know enough about M1 RAM use to feel confident that 16GB would serve my image editing and other processes I often run well into the future. I base this recommendation in part on my experience running 8GB and 16GB RAM albeit on Intel Macs. ![]() I think that she should be able to get another 10 years out of her MBA (which she loves BTW). ![]() After 20 years and at age 74, she is unlikely to change her spots. Another way to put it is that she does only very basic computing: word processing, email, Internet, etc. I use the term average even though it is rather imprecise. My wife is the quintessential average personal computer user. We recently replaced my wife's 2011 13" MBP with a refurbished 2020 M1 MacBook Air.Īfter researching the Apple Silicon design and reviewing various tests, user experiences, etc. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |